Level 2 · Module 6: Negotiation Basics · Lesson 3

Asking for More Than You Expect

conceptnegotiation-persuasion

In most negotiations, your opening ask should be higher than what you actually expect to get. This gives you room to make concessions — to move toward the other person — while still ending up near your real goal. But this tactic has ethical limits: your opening has to be justifiable, not absurd, and you have to be willing to explain your reasoning.

Building On

Positions and interests

We learned that positions are what you say you want, and interests are what you really need. This lesson teaches you how to choose your opening position strategically — starting higher than your real goal so you have room to move.

Why It Matters

Imagine you want your bedtime moved from 8:30 to 9:00. If you ask for exactly 9:00, you have nowhere to go. Your parent might counter with 8:45, and now you’re stuck between accepting less than you wanted or looking unreasonable by refusing a compromise. But if you ask for 9:30, and your parent counters with 9:00, you’ve “given in” to exactly what you wanted in the first place. Your parent feels like they negotiated you down. You got your actual goal. Both sides feel like the process was fair.

This is called anchoring, and it’s one of the most basic and powerful tactics in negotiation. Your opening number sets the frame for the whole discussion. If you start at 9:30, the conversation happens between 8:30 and 9:30. If you start at 9:00, it happens between 8:30 and 9:00. Where you start shapes where you end up.

But there’s a trap. If you ask for something ridiculous — “I want to stay up until midnight” — you lose credibility. The other person stops taking you seriously, and the negotiation is over before it starts. The art is asking for more than you expect while keeping your ask in the zone of reasonable.

A Story

Carlos and the Chore Deal

Carlos, age ten, wanted a new video game. It cost thirty dollars. His parents’ policy was that he had to earn money for non-birthday purchases by doing extra chores beyond his normal ones. His dad said, “Tell me what you think is fair.”

Carlos had thought about this. The game cost thirty dollars. He thought a fair deal would be washing the car three times (at five dollars each) plus helping organize the garage (at fifteen dollars for a full afternoon). That was his real target: three car washes plus the garage.

But he didn’t start there. He said, “How about I wash the car twice and you cover the rest?” His dad raised an eyebrow. “Ten dollars of work for a thirty-dollar game? Come on, Carlos. You’ve got to do better than that.” Carlos said, “Okay, what if I wash the car three times and clean out the garage?” His dad thought about it. The garage really did need cleaning, and Carlos was offering a full afternoon of work. “Deal,” he said.

Carlos walked away with exactly the arrangement he’d planned. His dad walked away feeling like he’d negotiated Carlos up from a lowball offer to a fair deal. Both were satisfied.

But here’s the thing Carlos almost got wrong. His first instinct had been to say, “How about I do one car wash and that’s it?” His older sister, Valentina, had stopped him. “If you ask for something that ridiculous, Dad won’t negotiate. He’ll just say no and walk away. Your opening has to be ambitious but not insulting. It has to be in the zone where the other person thinks, ‘That’s not enough, but it’s a starting point.’ Not ‘That’s so unreasonable I’m not even going to engage.’”

Vocabulary

Anchoring: Setting the starting point of a negotiation with your first offer or ask. The anchor shapes the whole discussion, because people tend to negotiate from wherever the conversation starts.
Opening position: Your first offer in a negotiation. It’s usually not what you actually expect — it’s higher (if you’re asking) or lower (if you’re offering) to give you room to move.
Concession: Moving from your opening position toward the other person’s position. Concessions make the other person feel like you’re being flexible, which makes them more willing to be flexible too.
Zone of reasonable: The range of opening positions that the other person will take seriously. Ask too low and you seem like a pushover. Ask too high and you seem absurd. The zone of reasonable is where you want to start.
Lowball: An opening offer so far from reasonable that it insults the other person or signals that you’re not negotiating in good faith.

Guided Teaching

Let’s be clear about why anchoring works psychologically. When your dad hears “two car washes,” that number sticks in his mind. Even when he pushes back, he’s negotiating from that anchor. If Carlos had started with “four car washes plus the garage,” his dad would have been negotiating down from there. The first number frames the discussion. That’s not a trick — it’s how human minds work.

Think about a negotiation you’ve been in. Did you start with your real target, or did you give yourself room to move? If you started with your real target, what happened when the other person pushed back?

Here’s the practical skill: before any negotiation, figure out three numbers (or three versions of what you want). Your ideal outcome — the best realistic result. Your target — what you actually expect to get. And your walk-away point — the minimum you’d accept before saying no. Your opening position should be at or above your ideal outcome. Your target is where you plan to end up. And your walk-away point keeps you from agreeing to something terrible just because the negotiation has momentum.

Let’s practice. Imagine you’re negotiating screen time for the weekend. Your walk-away point is 1 hour (you won’t accept less). Your target is 2 hours (what you’d be happy with). Your ideal is 3 hours (the best you could realistically get). What would you ask for? Why?

Now, the ethical line. Asking for more than you expect is a normal part of negotiation and both sides know it’s happening. When Carlos asked for two car washes, his dad knew that was a starting point, not a final offer. That’s fine. Both people understand the game.

But there’s a limit. If your opening position includes a lie — “All my friends get to stay up until 11” when they don’t — you’ve crossed from anchoring into deception. If your opening is so extreme that it wastes the other person’s time or insults their intelligence, you’re not anchoring, you’re being disrespectful. The test is: can you explain your opening position with a straight face and a real reason?

Carlos could say, “Two car washes is ten dollars of work, and I think that’s a fair starting point.” His dad could disagree, but the reasoning isn’t absurd. If Carlos had said, “One car wash for thirty dollars worth of stuff,” he couldn’t justify that. Valentina’s advice was perfect: ambitious but not insulting.

One more thing: anchoring works on you too. When someone makes you an offer, their number becomes your anchor. If a friend says, “I’ll trade you five baseball cards for your rare one,” and your rare card is worth twenty, you now have to resist the pull of their anchor. Knowing about anchoring protects you from it. When someone makes a first offer, ask yourself: is this number based on reality, or is it their anchor?

Pattern to Notice

This week, before any negotiation — even a small one — set your three points: ideal, target, and walk-away. Start your ask above your target and see what happens. Also notice when other people anchor you. When someone makes a first offer, ask: is that a real number or a strategic starting point? How does their number shape what feels “reasonable” to you?

A Good Response

A child who learns this lesson stops accepting the first offer and stops making their real target their opening ask. They learn to give themselves room to negotiate and to recognize when others are anchoring them. They understand that ambitious opening positions are normal and fair — within limits — and that the goal is to end up in a place where both sides feel the deal is reasonable.

Moral Thread

Honesty

There’s a line between strategic opening positions and dishonest demands. Honest negotiation means starting high while still being truthful about what you’re doing. If your opening position is a lie designed to trick the other person, you’ve crossed from negotiation into deception.

Misuse Warning

A child who gets too excited about anchoring might start making extreme demands in every situation. “I want twenty dollars for taking out the trash” is not an anchor — it’s absurd, and it teaches the child that negotiation is about seeing what you can get away with rather than finding fair deals. The ethical boundary is Valentina’s rule: ambitious but not insulting, with reasoning you can actually explain. If your child starts treating every interaction as a negotiation to be “won,” remind them that relationships matter more than any single deal. A reputation for unreasonable demands is not a negotiation advantage — it’s a reason for people to stop negotiating with you altogether.

For Discussion

1.Why did Carlos start by asking for two car washes when he knew his real target was three car washes plus the garage?
2.What was Valentina’s rule about opening positions? Why is it important to be ambitious but not insulting?
3.What is anchoring? How does the first number in a negotiation shape the rest of the conversation?
4.Think about a negotiation in your life. What would be your ideal, your target, and your walk-away point?
5.When is it honest to ask for more than you expect, and when does it cross into deception? What’s the difference?
6.How does knowing about anchoring protect you from being anchored by someone else?
7.Carlos’s dad felt good about the deal. Carlos felt good about the deal. Is that a sign of a good negotiation? Can both sides win?

Practice

The Three-Point Planner

1.Pick a real negotiation you’re going to have this week, or create a realistic scenario (asking for a later bedtime, negotiating a chore trade, deciding something with a friend).
2.Before the negotiation, set your three points: (1) Walk-away: the minimum you’d accept. (2) Target: what you’d be happy with. (3) Ideal: the best realistic outcome.
3.Now plan your opening position. It should be at or above your ideal, but within Valentina’s zone — ambitious but not insulting. Write down one real reason you can give for your opening position.
4.If possible, do the negotiation for real. Afterward, compare: where did you end up relative to your three points? Did anchoring work? Did the other person counter-anchor you?
5.Discuss with a family member: what worked? What would you do differently next time?

Memory Questions

1.What is anchoring? Why does the first number in a negotiation matter so much?
2.What are the three points you should set before any negotiation?
3.In the story, what was Carlos’s opening position? What was his real target? Why did he start there?
4.What was Valentina’s rule about opening positions?
5.When does asking for more than you expect cross the line into dishonesty?

A Note for Parents

This lesson teaches a real negotiation skill that your child can use immediately. Anchoring is genuinely powerful, and it’s important that your child learns both how to use it and how to recognize it. The ethical boundary is clearly drawn: ambitious but justifiable, not extreme or dishonest. At home, you might notice your child testing this skill with higher asks than usual. That’s fine — even desirable. Engage with it. Counter-offer. Let them experience the back-and-forth. The worst thing you can do is shut down their opening position with “that’s ridiculous, don’t even try.” That teaches them that negotiation is only allowed when they start where you want them to end. Instead, say “that’s ambitious — convince me” and let the process work. You’re teaching them that negotiation is a skill, not a battle — and that both sides should feel the process was fair.

Share This Lesson

Found this useful? Pass it along to another family walking the same road.